Partner
Fenwick & West LLP
San Francisco, California
Complex Civil Litigation Partner at Fenwick

Ben is a former federal prosecutor and experienced trial lawyer whose practice focuses on government investigations, regulatory enforcement matters, and complex civil litigation. Drawing on his years of prior experience at the Department of Justice, Ben specializes in helping cutting-edge technology, fintech, life sciences, healthcare, AI, and crypto companies navigate compliance and enforcement priorities within a complex landscape shaped by federal and state regulators and other agencies, including the DOJ, SEC, CFTC, FTC, CFPB, FinCEN, IRS, and various national security agencies.
Prior to joining Fenwick, Ben worked at DOJ for almost fifteen years, including over eleven years as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California. While at the USAO, Ben served as Chief of the Special Prosecutions Section and Chief of the Oakland Branch. In those roles, he led investigations, prosecutions, and trials of white collar, national security, cybercrime, public corruption, and civil rights cases. Ben joined the USAO as an AUSA in the Economic Crimes and Securities Fraud Section, where he investigated, prosecuted, and tried complex corporate crime and securities fraud matters. As an AUSA, Ben regularly partnered with DOJ’s National Security Division, Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, and Fraud Section, and with federal investigative agencies such as FBI, IRS, and Secret Service. He also worked closely with other federal regulators including the SEC, CFTC, FTC, Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security, and OFAC. During his time at the USAO, Ben was recognized with the Attorney General’s Award for Fraud Prevention for his work leading the government’s investigations into an American multinational financial services company for its opening of millions of customer accounts without authorization.
Ben began his career in the DOJ Honors Program in Washington, D.C., on the Appellate Staff of the Civil Division. In that position, he briefed and argued cases on behalf of the government across the federal circuit courts and in two state supreme courts. Working closely with Civil Division components, the Office of the Solicitor General, and other federal agencies, he was lead counsel for the United States and its agencies on cases involving constitutional law, national security law, challenges to federal regulatory programs, civil fraud, employment discrimination, and tort suits. He also served as Counsel to two Assistant Attorneys General of the Civil Division and to the Associate Attorney General, the Department’s third highest-ranking official. Ben was recognized with DOJ’s second-highest honor, the Attorney General’s Award for Distinguished Service, for his work in helping secure federal marriage equality. Ben served as DOJ's lead appellate counsel in the litigation challenging the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, the 1996 law that prohibited the U.S. government from recognizing same-sex marriages for purposes of federal law. Ben led the work in developing DOJ's position and briefing in the lower courts that the statute was unconstitutional, a position ultimately confirmed by the Supreme Court.
After law school, Ben clerked for the Honorable William A. Fletcher of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Fenwick & West LLP
San Francisco, California
U.S. Attorney’s Office, Oakland Branch
(appointed)California Northern District
U.S. Attorney’s Office, Special Prosecutions Section
(appointed)California Northern District
U.S. Attorney’s Office, Economic Crimes and Securities Fraud Section
(appointed)California Northern District
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)
(appointed)District of Columbia
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Civil Division
(appointed)District of Columbia
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Civil Division, Appellate Staff
(appointed)District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
(appointed)California
Served as judicial law clerk to the Honorable William A. Fletcher, researching and drafting opinions, orders, and bench memoranda.
USAO
February 2022
Recognized with the Attorney General’s Award for Fraud Prevention for his work leading the government’s investigations into an American multinational financial services company for its opening of millions of customer accounts without authorization.
DOJ
May 2012
Recognized with DOJ’s second-highest honor, the Attorney General’s Award for Distinguished Service, for his work in helping secure federal marriage equality
Fenwick Insights
August 2025
LinkFenwick Insights
June 2025
On February 10, 2025, the president signed an executive order that paused investigation and enforcement of the FCPA for a period of 180 days, required the DOJ to review any existing FCPA investigation or prosecution, and to issue new guidelines and policies as appropriate to adequately promote the president’s constitutional foreign policy authority and “prioritize American interests, American economic competitiveness with respect to other nations, and the efficient use of Federal law enforcement resources.”
Fenwick Insights
May 2025
On May 12, 2025, the Head of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Criminal Division, Matthew Galeotti, announced a new white collar enforcement plan in a memorandum entitled “Focus, Fairness, and Efficiency in the Fight Against White-Collar Crime.” The new memorandum and accompanying public remarks by Galeotti unveiled key changes to the division’s Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy (CEP) that provide greater incentives for corporations to investigate and voluntarily self-disclose conduct by employees that violates federal criminal laws and cooperate with DOJ investigations. This alert summarizes these changes to the CEP and assesses how they may impact the calculus for companies that are considering voluntary self-disclosure.
Fenwick Insights
February 2025
Channel partners offer significant benefits when your original equipment manufacturer, software manufacturer, or cloud-service provider is contracting with the federal government. But channel partners also introduce various compliance risks, because their actions can directly implicate you as the contractor—and recent Department of Justice enforcement actions show that violations by or involving channel partner sales to the government can result in settlements costing millions of dollars. Careful compliance, including planning and monitoring are key.
California
January 2025
CLE compliance deadlines are approaching, and Fenwick’s got you covered. Join us for our annual virtual CLE Speaker Series, where you’ll earn MCLE credit and get a front-row seat to the latest legal updates and insights in dynamic practice areas from Fenwick’s lawyers.