Christina Dines

Represented a Russian national in enforcing a USD 150 million arbitral award, including through successful briefing and oral argument preparation before the US Supreme Court. Represented an iconic American family in a high-net worth trust dispute. Represented a healthcare technology company in a regulatory investigation commenced by Federal Trade Commission alleging millions of dollars in consumer harm. Represented a healthcare technology company in investigating a whistleblower complaint. Represented a major news organization in a discrimination class action and wage and hour collective action. Represented a major news organization in defending against discrimination and retaliation claims, including through briefing at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Represented a biopharmaceutical company against claims asserted under the anti-retaliation provisions of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, including through briefing at the US Department of Labor - OSHA.

This article addresses how the scope of PFAS litigation has expanded, and how courts are trending in resolving PFAS litigation.

Litigants have reasonable expectations to finality, and the writ of mandamus can compel a hearing or resolution of a motion under the right circumstances. But before seeking a writ, ask repeatedly for a ruling on the record.

Youth courts provide an efficient—albeit unconventional—alternative to the formal juvenile justice system. Although structures of youth courts vary, the purpose remains the same: to rehabilitate and deter youth offenders in a forum largely governed by their minor peers—one free of the stigma associated with the traditional justice system. This Note examines the expansion and the implications of youth courts.

Co-presenter