Verified profile

Claire J. Evans

Partner at Wiley Rein LLP

Claire J. Evans's profile photo
LocationWashingtonDistrict of Columbia, United States
Government service7yrsSupreme Court of the United States · Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit · U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) · U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

About

Claire litigates complex trial and appellate matters before federal and state courts, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Federal Election Commission (FEC), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and state regulatory commissions, with particular emphasis on infrastructure and joint use disputes and challenges of agency action. 


Roles

May 2025–May 2025
Former role

Partner

Wiley Rein LLP

Washington, District of Columbia

Civil LitigationTechnologyHearings and AppealsInternational Trade LawElections & PoliticsRegulatory SpecialistMedia and CommunicationLitigation Support SpecialistAppellate Litigation
Jan 2008–Jan 2009
Former role

Law Clerk

Supreme Court of the United States

(appointed)District of Columbia

Law ClerkResearchLegal Assistance

Served as judicial law clerk to the Honorable Clarence Thomas, Researching and drafting opinions, orders, and bench memoranda.

Jan 2007–Jan 2008
Former role

Law Clerk

Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

(appointed)District of Columbia

Law ClerkResearchLegal Assistance

Served as judicial law clerk to the Honorable David B. Sentelle, Researching and drafting opinions, orders, and bench memoranda.

Jan 2006–Jan 2007
Former role

Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Criminal Division, Criminal Appellate Section

(appointed)District of Columbia

Criminal LawAppellate Litigation
Jan 2005–Jan 2006
Former role

Bristow Fellow

U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of the Solicitor General

(appointed)District of Columbia

AttorneyCriminal LawAppellate Litigation
Jan 2005–Dec 2005
Former role

Attorney

U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office of the General Counsel

(appointed)District of Columbia

Legal Officers and Practitioners
Jan 2004–Jan 2005
Former role

Law Clerk

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

(appointed)

Law ClerkResearchLegal Assistance

Served as judicial law clerk to the Honorable Michael Chertoff, Researching and drafting opinions, orders, and bench memoranda.

Jan 2002–Jan 2004
Former role

Law Clerk

U.S. District Court

(appointed)New Jersey, District of

Law ClerkResearchLegal Assistance

Served as judicial law clerk to the Honorable Jerome B. Simandle, Researching and drafting opinions, orders, and bench memoranda.

Representative matters

Experience

May 2025

Represents telecommunications companies in complex litigation and regulatory proceedings involving rate-setting disputes, the deployment of broadband infrastructure, wireless facility siting, joint use, and pole attachment issues. Litigates jurisdictional, constitutional, election law, intellectual property, and administrative law issues in trial and appellate courts. Counsels telecommunications companies on the scope of their federal rights and develops litigation strategies under the Communications Act and other applicable laws. Represents clients in agency rulemakings, investigations, and enforcement proceedings, including FCC Pole Attachment Complaint proceedings and FTC Civil Investigative Demands. Files amicus and merits briefs in the U.S. Courts of Appeals and the Supreme Court of the United States. Representative matters include: Joint use and rate disputes before state and federal courts, the FCC, and state regulatory commissions, including FCC Pole Attachment Complaint proceedings. Wireless siting disputes, including Sprint Spectrum et al. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Paramus, No. 14-2954 (3d Cir.). Appeals of agency action, including Ameren Corp. et al. v. FCC, No. 16-1683 (8th Cir.), Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. FEC, No. 14-1419 (D.D.C.), and Power Integrations, Inc. v. Kappos, No. 11-1254 (D.D.C.). File comments and pleadings in rulemakings and adjudications at federal agencies, including the FCC, FEC, and FTC. Constitutional cases, including Coors Brewing Company v. Mendez-Torres, No. 11-1559 (1st Cir.) and Software & Information Industry Association v. Solers, Inc., No. 10-1523 (D.C. App. Ct.). Patent litigation, including Porto Technology Co. v. Cellco Partnership, No. 12-678 (E.D. Va.), RSA Security LLC v. Zions Management Services Company, No. 12-11975 (D. Mass.), Callaway Golf Company v. Kappos, No. 11-266 (E.D. Va.), and pharmaceutical litigation involving aripiprazole (Abilify®), cyclobenzaprine HCl (Amrix®), and fenofibrate (Antara®). Copyright royalty fee litigation before the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) rate court to set license fees for the public performance of musical works in wireless communications products and services.

Recognition

Honors

Recommended Lawyer

The Legal 500 US

January 2024

Recognized in The Legal 500 US as a "Recommended Lawyer" in Appellate: Court of Appeals (2017-2024) and Telecom and Broadcast: Regulatory (2014-2018, 2020-2024)

Link

Appellate Editorial Advisory Board

Law360

January 2024

Named to Law360's Appellate Editorial Advisory Board (2022-2024)

Publications & speeches

In Huge Win for Telecommunications Industry, 5G, and Broadband, Ninth Circuit Upholds Vast Majority of FCC Infrastructure Orders

Wiley.law

August 2020

On August 12, 2020, in a major victory for the telecommunications industry, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision in City of Portland v. United States. In the much-anticipated ruling, the court upheld two orders that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) adopted in 2018 to streamline deployment and reduce costs of telecommunications infrastructure and facilitate the provision of fifth generation wireless (5G) and broadband services. The orders at issue applied prior FCC interpretations of preemptive provisions in the Communications Act to limit local barriers to small wireless facility (small cell) siting in a number of areas including fees, aesthetics, and application processing timeframes, and separately, took further action to speed deployment on utility poles and eliminate artificially high pole attachment rates that persist despite prior Commission orders.

Link

FCC Seeks Data and Comment About Ways to Streamline and Expedite Local Approval of Small Cell Wireless Infrastructure Deployment

Wiley.law

December 2016

On December 22, 2016, the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC or Commission) Wireless Telecommunications Bureau released a Public Notice that invites interested parties to submit data showing whether and to what extent local siting processes are delaying or hindering the deployment of wireless infrastructure and requests input about actions that the FCC could take to streamline and expedite the process.

Link

Round Two: Joint Use After the D.C. Circuit's Pole Attachment Decision

BNA’s Communications Environmental & Land Use Law Report, Vol. 2013, No. 5

May 2013

Co-author

Link

Wireless Pole Attachments: Best Practices

EUCI Conference — Newport Beach, CA

February 2019

Speaker

Link

Wireless Pole Attachments: Best Practices

EUCI Conference — Anaheim, CA

January 2018

Speaker

Link

Utility Pole Attachments: Understanding New FCC Regulations and Industry Trends

EUCI Course — Nashville, TN

May 2018

Speaker

Link

Utility Pole Attachments: Understanding New FCC Regulations and Industry Trends

EUCI Course — Atlanta, GA

May 2017

Speaker