Of Counsel
Wiley Rein LLP
Washington, District of Columbia
Environmental and Chemical Regulatory Attorney

Sara Beth advises clients on environmental, chemical regulatory, and occupational safety compliance issues, including the integration of various regulatory requirements into comprehensive compliance strategies. Her practice includes work with pesticides, industrial chemicals, agricultural products, medical devices, dietary supplements, contaminated property issues, and environmental due diligence in transactions.
Sara Beth advises companies and trade associations navigating through technical and cross-cutting issues under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA); the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA); the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA); the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA); the Clean Water Act (CWA); the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA); the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA); the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS); the Controlled Substances Act (CSA); and related federal and state regulatory programs such as California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act (Proposition 65).
Wiley Rein LLP
Washington, District of Columbia
Steptoe & Johnson LLP
Washington | Batimore, District of Columbia
I focus on environmental, chemical regulatory, and occupational safety litigation and compliance counseling, including the integration of various regulatory requirements into a comprehensive compliance strategy. My practice includes work with pesticides, industrial chemicals, agricultural products, medical devices and dietary supplements. I also work with contaminated property issues and environmental due diligence in transactions.
Steptoe & Johnson LLP
Washington | Batimore, District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
(appointed)
Served as judicial law clerk to the Honorable Will Garwood, researching and drafting opinions, orders, and bench memoranda.
Euromoney’s Expert Guide
January 2017
Euromoney’s Expert Guide to the World’s Leading Women in Business Law (2010-2017)
Who’s Who Legal
January 2013
Who’s Who Legal, Environment (2009-2013)
Wiley.law
September 2024
On September 27, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule extending the submission deadline for the 2024 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) from September 30 to November 22, 2024 (89 Fed. Reg. 79150). EPA’s Chemical Data Exchange (CDX) reporting tool incorrectly indicated in some circumstances that Confidential Business Information was captured in a submission when it was not. EPA extended the deadline to allow submitters to review their submissions and update as appropriate.
Wiley.law
September 2024
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia recently found, in what it described as a “question of first impression,” that Section 5(b)(3) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), a provision requiring public disclosure of information on the receipt of new TSCA Section 5 filings and health and safety data, was a “freestanding right to information” obligation and independent of a TSCA regulatory function. This court, in its August 20 opinion, reiterated the position that public right-to-know about chemicals in commerce is a central function of TSCA.
Wiley.law
July 2024
The U.S. Supreme Court issued two opinions at the end of its term impacting environmental law. In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Court held that courts must exercise independent judgment when determining if an agency acted within its statutory authority, overruling the 1984 decision in Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which directed courts to defer to an agency’s interpretation of ambiguous statutory language, so long as the agency’s interpretation was “permissible.”
Wiley.law
May 2024
Only six months after proposing to amend the procedures for risk evaluations under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the final rule was published in the Federal Register on May 3, 2024. A flurry of activity will soon follow on many reviews that were put on hold while the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) made fundamental shifts in direction on how these evaluations will be conducted in the years to come.
Wiley.law
February 2024
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued its final rule that significantly raises user fees under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). As shown below, there are large fee increases in key areas such as new chemical submissions and existing chemical reviews. These fees go into effect on April 22, 2024.
Wiley.law — Webinar
February 2025
As the second Trump Administration begins, significant shifts in the federal government’s approach to chemical regulation appear imminent. The main forces of change include the ongoing legal challenges to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 6 rules and Section 21 petitions, the Administration’s domestic priorities, and expected measures in key states.
Wiley 2024 TSCA Webinar Series — Webinar
May 2024
On May 3, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) final rule on procedures for chemical risk evaluation under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) was published in the Federal Register. In the words of EPA’s Assistant Administrator, this rule “was a big step for TSCA.”
ABA SEER Chemical, Pesticide, Right-to-know Committee and Environmental Enforcement and Crimes Committee
July 2023
Link