Verified profile

Vivek A. Patel

Partner in Baker McKenzie’s Tax Practice Group

Vivek A. Patel's profile photo
LocationWashingtonDistrict of Columbia, United States
Current rolePartnerBaker McKenzie LLP · since Jan 2020
Government service2yrsTax Court

About

Vivek A. Patel is a partner in Baker McKenzie’s Tax Practice Group in Washington, DC, where he handles various aspects of tax law including tax controversy and international dispute resolution for multinational corporations. Vivek has represented clients before courts, tribunals, and administrative bodies to successfully resolve a broad spectrum of international and domestic issues. Prior to joining Baker McKenzie, Vivek worked as Attorney Advisor to the Honorable Thomas B. Wells at United States Tax Court.

Roles

Jan 2020–Present
Current role

Partner

Baker McKenzie LLP

Washington, District of Columbia

Civil LitigationInternational Trade LawAppellate LitigationTax AttorneyTax Law

Vivek’s practice focuses on the resolution of Federal income tax controversies and disputes with the IRS and other taxing authorities. Vivek advises clients throughout all administrative phases of a controversy, including audit, administrative appeals, and alternative dispute resolution proceedings. He has also helped clients successfully resolve cases before the United States Tax Court, United States Courts of Appeals, and other courts throughout the country, as well as in various non-U.S. jurisdictions. Vivek also advises clients on compliance with partnership tax audit and dispute strategies under both TEFRA and the Bipartisan Budget Act, as well as on procedural and substantive challenges to regulations and other administrative guidance.

Vivek also handles corporate tax planning related to domestic and international transactions, including transfer pricing considerations and supply chain ramifications. He assists clients with the implementation of global tax structures and strategies.

Sep 2014–Dec 2019
Former role

Tax Associate

Baker McKenzie LLP

Washington | Batimore, District of Columbia

Tax AttorneyTax Law
Jul 2012–Aug 2014
Former role

Attorney Advisor (Law Clerk)

Tax Court

(appointed)District of Columbia

Law ClerkResearchLegal AssistanceAccount Manager

Drafted court opinions, orders, and correspondence regarding Federal income, estate, and gift taxes; assisted in trial preparation of IRS deficiency and collections hearings; and analyzed substantive tax issues and procedural strategies to adjudicate proceedings and dispose parties’ motions.

Sep 2008–Aug 2011
Former role

Advisory Committee Member

Pro Bono Partnership of Atlanta

Atlanta, Georgia

Tax Law

Counseled tax-exempt and non-profit organizations on activities and operations; prepared IRS Form 1023 and corporate documents for various tax-exempt organizations; provided emergency advice regarding payroll tax issues and Federal tax filing obligations to local tax-exempt organizations; prepared presentations and created client letters on maintaining tax-exempt status and matters of corporate governance; advised Board of Directors and Executive Officers of the Pro Bono Partnership of Atlanta regarding strategic planning, client outreach, and fundraising possibilities; and performed additional duties as Intern Assistant and volunteer from January 2007 to August 2011.

Sep 2008–Aug 2011
Former role

Associate - Federal Income Tax

Alston & Bird LLP

Atlanta, Georgia

ResearchLegal AssistanceTax Law

Drafted tax opinions, IRS protest letters, and client correspondence on matters of corporate and partnership taxation, including international tax ramifications of discharge of indebtedness income and qualification for renewable energy tax credits and bond programs; represented multi-national corporations before federal courts, including litigation on tax treatment of telecommunications support payments; proposed tax structures for complex corporate transactions, including Section 368(a)(1)(A) reorganizations in connection with initial public offerings; analyzed information reporting requirements and advised clients on tax compliance obligations, including IRS OVDP initiative and FATCA implementation; lectured at various conferences on the tax treatment of series limited liability companies and on real estate income tax issues.

Publications & speeches

Georgia Limited Liability Company: Forms and Practice Manual (Third Edition)

Data Trace Publishing Company

January 2010

Link

United States: Moore is not enough ─ How to recover an unconstitutional tax

Bloomberg Tax in Tax Management International Journal

July 2023

On 26 June 2023, the US Supreme Court granted certiorari in Moore v. United States, a case challenging the constitutionality of the transition tax, the keystone provision of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. If the Court ultimately holds that the transition tax is unconstitutional because it is not a tax on income within the meaning of the Sixteenth Amendment, that decision will render it void ab initio. On this point, the authors are neither advocating for nor predicting a particular outcome. Instead, this article highlights one challenge we anticipate: If the transition tax is held to be unconstitutional, how can taxpayers recover a 2017 tax in 2024?

Link

United States: IRS targets large corporations in enforcement trifecta

bakermckenzie.com

October 2023

On 20 October 2023, the IRS issued a press release announcing a new initiative to send compliance alerts to roughly 150 US subsidiaries of large foreign corporations that distribute goods in the United States to challenge transfer pricing practices that it alleges resulted in improper losses and exceedingly low margins year after year. Further, in 2024 the IRS will expand the Large Corporate Compliance (LCC) program to include audits of an additional 60 corporate taxpayers selected using artificial intelligence (AI) and input from subject matter experts.

Link

United States: Research & Risk - Eighth Circuit agrees with Tax Court on "funded" research

bakermckenzie.com

August 2024

On May 6, 2024, the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued an opinion in Meyer, Borgman & Johnson, Inc. v. Commissioner, affirming the decision of the US Tax Court below. The Court's ruling emphasized that, in cases where research is "funded" for purposes of the section 41 research credit, the contracts at issue must expressly provide, or clearly imply, that a taxpayer's right to payment was "contingent on the success of the research" in order for the taxpayer's research expenses to be eligible for the credit.

Link

United States: Varian ─ Challenging the validity of tax regulations after Loper Bright

bakermckenzie.com

October 2024

On August 26, 2024, the US Tax Court held in Varian Medical Systems Inc. v. Commissioner that a taxpayer is entitled to the section 245A dividends-received deduction for the section 78 dividends that arose in connection with the section 965 transition tax. The Court also held that section 245A(d)(1) partially disallows certain foreign tax credits (FTCs) on the amounts that are deducted under section 245A. This case provided the first opportunity for the Tax Court to apply the Supreme Court's decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which overruled agency deference established in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984).

Link