Verified profile

William V. Roppolo

Head of Litigation, New York and Miami at Baker McKenzie

William V. Roppolo's profile photo
LocationMiamiFlorida, United States
Current rolePartnerBaker McKenzie · since May 2024
Government service2yrsUnited States Customs Service

About

William Roppolo is the Head of Litigation and Government Enforcement for Baker McKenzie's New York and Miami offices and serves as Co-Chair of the North America Trial Team. He is also Lead Partner of the Miami office. William has successfully tried commercial and criminal cases throughout the United States, including matters involving alleged antitrust, fraud and money laundering violations. He began his legal career investigating financial crimes with the United States Customs Service. William is a former President of the Federal Bar Association's South Florida Chapter and served on the national Federal Bar Association's Professional Ethics Committee. He has published many articles on topics including anti-corruption, PFAS litigation, Federal Trade Commission enforcement trends, and trial strategies.

Roles

May 2024–Present
Current role

Partner

Baker McKenzie

Miami, Florida

InvestigationsWhite Collar CrimeLitigation Support SpecialistAntitrustCriminal Investigation

William is a trial lawyer who focuses on high value, bet-the-company disputes concerning multinational corporations and individuals. He has successfully resolved cases involving antitrust and FTC investigations, money laundering, trade secrets, breach of fiduciary duties, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, export control laws, customs fraud and financial crimes. William has obtained multiple not guilty jury verdicts for clients and prevented many others from criminal investigation and indictment. He routinely represents high profile individuals and entities in crisis situations.

Aug 2020–May 2022
Former role

Financial Crimes Investigator

United States Customs Service

(appointed)

White Collar Crime

Representative matters

Legal

July 2025

• Lead counsel for Hall of Fame golfer Phil Mickelson in his antitrust suit against the PGA Tour. • Lead counsel to Benefytt Technologies in its internal investigation and defense of claims brought by the FTC for alleged consumer protection violations. • Lead counsel to court appointed liquidators of Premier Assurance Group in their efforts to recoup funds misappropriated from policy holders. • Defended healthcare company in SEC investigation alleging misleading and false statement and reporting to investors. • Defended internet technology company in FTC investigation alleging billions of dollars in consumer harm. • Represent pharmaceutical company in arbitration against laboratory accused of gross negligence in manufacturing cancer drug. • Represent iconic American family in trust dispute against purported new spouse of deceased heir. • Defended European banker in PDVSA kleptocracy and money laundering investigation. • On behalf of a global service provider, obtained a multimillion-dollar international arbitration award which included rescission of a stock purchase agreement returning a subsidiary back to its previous shareholders. The tribunal found that the former shareholders did not disclose bribes paid to public officials to win government contracts. • Represented a global distributor of electronics in an investigation by the Bureau of Industry and Security for alleged export violations. • Represented a Fortune 500 pharmaceutical company in an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission into alleged FCPA violations in China. • Represented a global food producer who allegedly violated the Packers and Stockyards Act (anti-trust based violations). • Represented a Caribbean-based investment company in recovering assets misappropriated through fraud. • Representing a multibillion-dollar company in parallel government investigations regarding alleged exports contrary to the Export Administration Regulations and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations. • Obtained a full acquittal for a criminal defendant charged in a 12-count indictment alleging tax fraud and conspiracy to commit tax fraud. After deliberating for less than two hours, a federal jury found William's client not guilty on all charges. • Successfully obtained a dismissal as lead counsel in an USD 11 billion civil RICO claim against an international logistics company. • Successfully defended a yacht salesman accused of nine counts of money laundering indictment that stemmed from an Internal Revenue Service sting operation in the Southern District of Florida. After a three-week trial, a federal jury found William's client not guilty on all charges. • Successfully petitioned US Customs and Border Protection on behalf of a leading international freight services provider to completely rescind a large penalty for violations of 19 USC §§ 1595a(b) and 1499.

Publications & speeches

How To Navigate The FTC's New Private Equity Frontier

Law360

October 2023

Co-author

Link

United States: FTC Continues Targeting Private Equity with Challenge Against "Roll-Up" Acquisition Strategy

InsightPlus

September 2023

On 21 September 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that it was suing private-equity firm Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe (WCAS) and its minority-owned portfolio company, U.S. Anesthesiology Partners, Inc. (USAP) for allegedly undertaking an anticompetitive acquisition strategy to "roll-up" multiple Texas-based aesthesia practices.1 In the action, the FTC alleges violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act and Sections 1 & 2 of the Sherman Act, and is pursuing expansive relief—including limitations on the ability of WCAS to make acquisitions in the future.

Link

FTC Puts Companies on Notice That Failure to Provide Support for Their Product Claims Could Result in Civil Penalties

InsightPlus

April 2023

Co-author

Link

US Court of Appeals Holds That Supreme Court’s AMG Capital Holding Does Not Limit the FTC’s Powers Under § 19 of the FTC Act,

InsightPlus

February 2023

On January 27, 2023, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued its unanimous (3-0) decision in FTC v. Simple Health Plans, LLC, et al., No. 21-13116. This matter stemmed from an individual defendant’s emergency motion to dissolve a preliminary injunction that a district court had issued under Sections 13(b) and 19 of the FTC Act. The district court denied the emergency motion, and the defendant appealed.

Link

How The PFAS Litigation Landscape Is Expanding

Law360

January 2023

For nearly a decade, plaintiffs have been filing lawsuits over the alleged environmental and health consequences associated with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — sometimes called forever chemicals. Initially, these lawsuits were largely against early manufacturers of Teflon and other common household products.

Link

You've Been Served – Are You Ready to Respond?

Corporate Counsel Business Journal Webinarr

November 2023

Co-Presenter

Effective Strategies for Managing PFAS Risks

Baker McKenzie Webinar

May 2023

Co-Presenter

Foul – The FIFA Debacle and How it Affects Financial Institutions,

New Kingston, Jamaica

October 2015

Presenter at the Fourth Annual Anti-Money Laundering/Counter-Financing of Terrorism Conference.

Appropriately Scoping an Internal Investigation

Baker McKenzie Insights into Litigation Webinar Series

May 2014

Co-presenter

The Expanding Scope of Successor Liability,

Baker McKenzie Webinar

April 2014

Presenter